thfc1882.com

Spurs blog

41 Points & We’re Safe From Relegation

6 Comments »

What a difference one result makes and more importantly a change in formation. Don’t we all feel a lot better today? It wasn’t just the three points won at a very tough place to go to and it’s not like we were at our fluent best but the sight of seeing two strikers on the pitch, albeit one of them being Crouch and the other Defoe, who I thought enjoyed one of his worse performances in a Spurs shirt, gave us all renewed enthusiasm for the remainder of the season. Plus as an added bonus it took us beyond the magical 40 points mark so now we can all relax and know we’ll be playing premier league football next season. ;)

I’ve noticed a plethora of spurs blogs being updated today which must mean we’re all a lot more positive today and that’s down to Mr Redknapp. If you’ve read this blog in the past you may have noticed I don’t believe Harry’s infallible when it comes to errors no matter how much success he’s had in the last 18 months. The last few games have been testament to that but last night he got it spot on. We were all crying out for a return to 4-4-2 and he duly delivered. I’ll admit when I saw the team I had mixed feelings. I was delighted with the formation and the inclusion of Corluka for the hapless Hutton but less excited about the prospect of watching Lennon on the left and Crouch up front.

A very handsome man wrote in his match preview:

There’s no point in playing Crouch against Samba because he’s unlikely to win the ball in the air but he does have a good record against Blackburn so if he starts then so be it but my preference would be Pav and Defoe.

Some would say that’s a clear error on my part considering how 3-metre-Peter leapt through the air like a Salmon to bury the ball into the bottom corner and leave Samba looking like a bear with a sore head who couldn’t catch his dinner. However, if you look closer you’ll also see how beautifully I covered my tracks by mentioning his record against Blackburn. It’s like reading an ITK statement made by the poet laureate. For the record I thought Crouch was very good last night. It’s only one game but more of that for the final 14 games of the season could help a lot. It wasn’t just his goal either, for the most part of held it up well and linked play, in particular with vdV on the right. These two seem to have some sort of telepathy going on whether it be in the box or outside it.

As a result of my delayed response to writing some sort of reaction to last nights match I expect like me you’ve already read many of the other corners of the internet and seen the player ratings etc so there’s not much point in doing the same here. Before I briefly mention those who had good games last night I just wanted to address a player who I thought played well but I’ve seen many comments to the contrary. Wilson Palacios, as we all know, has been garbage for the majority of his games for the past year. Every now and then he has a good game but follows that up with a performance that see’s him substituted at half time. We definitely need better. However, whether it be Palacios, Crouch, Jenas or vdV, no matter what a players past performances are like they should be judged on their last match and for me, Wilson had a good solid game.

Stats can tell different stories depending on how you want to look at them but Palacios’s from last night only confirm his performance for me. As you’ll see from the image on the right he only misplaced 5 passes which gave him a completion rate of 90%. Decent for any player. I understand the problems people have with the type of pass he makes, often sideways and short, sometimes laboured and slow but he’s a defensive midfielder. His job is to win the ball and do his best to give it to one of the more creative players around him, which is what he did. Couple that with his 3 interceptions, 0 fouls and 3 from 4 tackles won and he had a good game. I’m not saying he was excellent on the night or even close to a man of the match performance but a 7/10 is surely justified? The funny thing is the one pass I remember him making all night is one of those 5 failed attempts and that’s from someone who thought he had a good game. I guess when you spend so long disappointing we only see what we expect to see.

We all probably agree that van der Vaart returned to some sort of form and put in a shift on the right side of midfield, tracking back when needed and generally making a nuisance of himself to the opposition. It’s good to see such a talented player taking one for the team and it’s not as if he was told to stay on the right and not get forward too much. For the first 20 minutes of the second half we were closer to playing a 4-3-3 than a 4-4-2.

Other performances of note were Jenas who put in one of his rare excellent performances that make you hope he’s finally understood what he’s meant to do and will do it every week only to watch him in the next game be completely useless again. We’ve all said it before and I’m sure we’ll say it again but if he could just play like that every game he’d be like a new signing. Or at least up his value so we could sell him.

Gallas is fast becoming our Mr Consistent. I’m happy to admit when I’m wrong and I was about him. I thought he was too injury prone and a sulker but he gives the impression that he just wants to play football. Ekotto and Charlie were good too. It’s nice to see Corluka back in the side, although we shouldn’t expect much going forward as he showed at times last night but as a defender he’s far superior to Hutton which is what we need at the moment. Gomes made a string of superb saves but still gives us and those around him the jitters when the ball’s in the air. A good defence is always confident of it’s keeper and I don’t think ours is, but his saves won us the game as much as Crouch’s goal.

A final word on our two munchkins, Lennon and Defoe. One looks to be gaining confidence and discipline out on the left and the other looks a shadow of himself. While Lennon’s threat might not be quite as great when he’s got to cut inside all the time if he can pick the right pass instead of running into defenders once he does cut in he could be more effective there than on the right. Some work with his left foot wouldn’t go amiss either. Defoe on the other hand is a tricky problem for Redknapp. I presume it was Defoe who Redknapp believed was as good as Suarez which is why he pulled out of signing the Uruguay international. On last night’s display that decision could cost us. Defoe has always been a confidence player and with his injuries, suspensions and then seeing the club trying their best to sign a new striker his confidence is clearly low, but how do you fix it? If you put him on the bench and give someone else a chance it’ll get even worse but if he continues to play like that he doesn’t deserve to start. Personally, with a home game coming up I’d start him again and hope he scores or at least plays well. If not, it could be time for a rest.

All in all a very enjoyable night. Redknapp made the right formation selection and an excellent substitution that effected the game for the good.

Forget the FA Cup and the transfer window. Who cares about the Olympic Stadium, Northumberland Development Project or injuries to key players. All that matters now is beating Bolton on Saturday afternoon. String together a few back to back wins and with those above us playing each other we’ve got what could be our final chance to put pressure on them and maybe still sneak into the top 4. That is unless we go back to a lone striker.

Dear Blackburn: You Want Some? Come Get Some.

9 Comments »

Just a short preview today because there’s no need to fanny about with formations and tactics. Keep it simple.

Ok, so we’re missing some very influential players for tonights game, especially Modric who we lost this morning to an appendix operation but I’m feeling positive. We’ve returned to our soft underbelly away from home recently, Blackburn look to be putting a good run together and there’s a feeling of doom and gloom among the Tottenham faithful but I haven’t felt this positive since the last time we played Blackburn.

In that game we went back to a more familiar 4-4-2 and we not only played well but we scored 4 goals. Yes, playing well AND scoring goals in a non champions league game. Hard to believe but it happened. With the injuries we’ve got we must play with two strikers. It has to happen and there’s no excuse win, lose or draw if we don’t.

van der Vaart can slot back into midfield, whether that be replacing Modric and playing his role or out on the left. He’ll obviously drift in but as long as we have someone like Pienaar who’s a lot more disciplined than vdV playing centrally he should be able to cover any spaces left and protect Ekotto. There’s no point in playing Crouch against Samba because he’s unlikely to win the ball in the air but he does have a good record against Blackburn so if he starts then so be it but my preference would be Pav and Defoe.

Defensively we’re a little light too with injuries and suspensions but again we should have enough in the squad to cover those absentees. Get Corluka back into the team whether that be at right back preferably or centre back if Gallas isn’t fit. I’d like to see Charlie given another shot and long stint in the first team behind Lennon because not only does it mean we’re better in defence but Lennon plays better with Charlie than he does with Hutton.

So, it’s simple. Like back in November, play 4-4-2 which the majority of our players are comfortable with, keep possession and play high tempo football. Whether it be Sandro, Palacios or Jenas alongside Pienaar/vdV make sure they just sit in front of the defence and allow the 5 players in front of them to play. Back to basics as it were. It’s what Redknapp’s good at after all. Pick the best players available, play them in their favourite positions where possible and tell them to go out there and enjoy it.

Blackburn’s a very tough place to go but if we get the personnel and formation right we can keep hanging onto the coattails of Chelsea in fourth. If, like we’ve done in recent games, we try to be cute with the formation we’ll cement the last few weeks as the worse in Redknapps tenure with a negative result against a fast improving team.

Lets go back into the future and put on a performance we all know we can.

Prediction: 4-4-2 and we win; anything else and we don’t. It’s that simple.

Didn’t We Almost Have It All?

14 Comments »

Didn’t we almost have it all? When love was all we had worth giving. The ride with you was worth the fall my friend. Loving you makes life worth living. Didn’t we almost have it all? The night we held on till the morning. You know you’ll never love that way again. Didn’t we almost have it all?

~ Whitney Houston featuring Tottenham Hotspur Football Club

The transfer window’s closed and its the second one in a row where we’ve failed miserably. The difference this time was we didn’t pull off a shock last minute raid on Real Madrid to cover our ineptitude in the market up until then. Much like the difference between Fulham away and Inter Milan away. I wish I could take credit for this updates title and the song lyric idea but that was down to Kevin Jones on twitter and since he said it last night I haven’t been able to get the song or the idea that he’s spot on out of my head.

I can’t be positive about what’s happening at Spurs at the moment. If you want to take that view instead of looking at what might’ve been and why it isn’t, can I point you in the direction of Tottenblog Hotspur who’s doing exactly that.

There are a few cardinal sins in football. Don’t hit long hopeful balls up to small quick strikers, don’t chop and change your manager every 18 months, don’t sell your best players, don’t neglect your youth set-up and don’t fail to improve your team when you’re on top.

Unfortunately, the last one we’ve committed recently. The others we’ve been doing for the past 20 years. There are so many variables to gaining long term success in a football team, a lot of them revolve around money nowadays, hence the need for a larger capacity stadium which people believe will automatically lead to success and better players. I wonder had we been in a bigger stadium now if we’d still tried to sign Phil Neville for £500k? There’s no reason to suggest we wouldn’t have tried to sign Charlie Adam either. The fact the last thing we need is another creative midfielder seemed to bypass Redknapp and Levy last night as they tried in vain to give the fans something. Anything.

Last week I wrote a piece highlighting what we’ve done in the transfer windows since Redknapp took charge and the one thing to note is the approximate net spend in the last 4 windows, including this one, is only £26m. That’s £6.5m per window, or if you like less than Charlie Adam would’ve cost. We only spent £14m last summer which was when we should’ve been doing our utmost to cement that top 4 position. The vast majority of the players we’ve bought have either left or don’t get close to a start. If we look at the players we’ve signed in this window can anyone honestly say that’ll be any different with Pienaar and Khumalo? If they start playing every week I can guarantee one thing and that’ll be because we’ve gone backwards.

Why haven’t we consolidated that top 4 position? On that fateful night in Manchester I started imagining what players we would now add to the squad. Obviously we needed a striker and a really good one at that. A defensive midfielder would be nice too. How about a left back to cover/compete with Ekotto? I would’ve settled for that. What we got was a young Brazilian still finding his way in the game for £6m, an injury prone William Gallas to act as cover at centre half (who’s performed well recently when fit), a keeper who’s never going to play and at the very last minute Daniel Levy having managed to pull off one of the signings of the season with no help or input from his manager got van der Vaart, an attacking midfielder.

The writing was on the wall from that moment. £14m spent when we should’ve been looking at double that. That’s not to say the more money you spend the better the player. It was more the fact we didn’t sign the right players in the right positions. All summer Harry was discussing Craig Bellamy and Scott Parker. Bellamy has since spent his time in Cardiff, in the physio room and in police custody.

This window has been the same, well almost. At least we noticed we needed a striker. Redknapp realised the strikers HE bought over the last 2 years for a total of £40.5m aren’t good enough for where we are now. 6 months too late but better late than never right? Bids for Carroll, Rossi, Forlan, Suarez and Aguero were reportedly made. How many of those are actually true is unknown and I highly doubt we rustled up £38.5m for Aguero but decided to pull out of the Suarez or Rossi deals.

We’ve missed out badly. There’s no other way to look at it. You could say because of the ridiculously inflated fee’s and salaries that were flying about we managed to save ourselves but when you look at Pienaar on £70k per week and on a long contract I’m not falling for the “we’ve been sensible” approach.

Then there’s the fact Levy, Redknapp, the FA, the world and us know Harry will be off in 18 months time. That’s got to have an impact on signings hasn’t it? Everyone knows what’s going to happen when Capello leaves the national job. I’m not even sure how much Redknapp is doing with regards to transfers. Is he even the one suggesting the players? According to him, very much like the vdV transfer he was contacted by Levy late last night and asked if he would like Charlie Adam. Redknapp said yes (for what reason I don’t know) and Levy then went for it. Surely it’s down to the manager to select the players to go for? The other option is the manager says he’d like players in certain positions and is then consulted when Levy finds someone he can afford, which begs the question did Harry say he wanted another midfielder? Are we trying to buy ALL the midfielders so there aren’t any left for other teams? This apparent scatter-gun approach has left me wondering what’s going on at the club? Do we have the money to spend? Is Redknapp having any say on these transfers or is Levy being careful knowing he won’t be there in 18 months?

Were the offers we made real offers? What I mean by this is were they stories for the press to make us look like we were trying to sign someone and keep the fans vaguely happy? We can’t moan if we at least tried to sign the right players can we? All of them were turned down. Every single one of them. Why is that? Could it be Redknapp’s comments about it being unlikely we’ll get into the Champions League again this season? I doubt it but that couldn’t have helped. Were we making offers knowing we’d get turned down because we were offering money in lots of instalments? Why did we offer £38.5m on Aguero on the last day of a transfer window, knowing full well unless his club agreed immediately it would be very hard to push through in time? If we had that amount of money there’s no way we should be coming out the other side without a striker. If you read between the lines and ask yourself those questions, something doesn’t add up.

To finish I wanted to take a look at some of the other signings that happened in this window just to show what deals were available. There’s no point in discussing those that didn’t happen because for all we know they would never happen but if these did happen why weren’t we doing the business? (the first 3 are tongue in cheek)

  • Darren Bent (£18m)
  • David Whether (£2.3m)
  • John Carew (loan)
  • Wayne Bridge (loan) – cover for left back?
  • Ryan Babel (£6m)
  • Obafemi Martins (loan)
  • Sulley Muntari (loan)
  • Daniel Sturridge (loan)
  • Luis Suarez (£23m)
  • Andy Carroll (£35m)

I know there might not be the world class player we were looking for in that list but it would be a fool to think Bridge, Muntari and Suarez for a total of £23m wouldn’t have improved our team/squad immensely. If we’re short of money what about Martins on loan for the rest of the season? That’s no money spent but additions in the positions we need. He could’ve and probably would’ve offered us more or at least something different. Take a punt on the young Sturridge? Andy Carroll went for a stupid amount of money but if the reports are true that we offered £23m for him and they accepted £35m and were left without a replacement striker why weren’t we offering money plus a player to Newcastle? Maybe we were. Who knows?

My belief was Harry Redknapp was a wheeler dealer and yet he hasn’t managed to bring in a bargain that’s remained in the team since he joined. Phil Neville for £500k probably to play as a defensive midfielder or Sulley Muntari on loan? What would you choose? Seems an odd one too given Redknapp used to manage him. It almost makes you wonder if he’s not universally loved by all his players as he and the press make out.

Anyway, whether this is down to Redknapp, Levy, the inflated market, cash-flow, club stature, manager uncertainty, champions league status etc we’ll probably never know. The one thing we do know is Harry was right, it’s going to be very hard to get back into the top 4.